根据德勒兹的说法，电影是一种类似于现代哲学的媒介，因为它以自己的方式(即它自己在时间上的运动)对运动和时间进行哲学探讨。德勒兹对那些在故事中以冲突的形式表现和叙述哲学关键问题的电影不感兴趣，但电影本身就是一种哲学，使伟大的电影制作人成为伟大的思想家，可能是二十世纪唯一能够在单一生活世界中思考技术、身体和大脑的哲学家。
https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/
- Mesha11:00Simple but beautiful
- Dania Safdar11:00really liked the colour of colour contrast
- Samuel Jewitt11:01the slow ppace of the animation really give you the time to think about the content
- Mesha11:01I was a little confused with the gender contrast. I suppose that that could be intentional- that we do not know their original gender?
- Dania Safdar11:01The dialogues felt very real, the hesitation and struggle.
- Zhuxuan Zhang (Zizi)11:02really relate to chinese’s culture background. feels
- Im curious why they repeated the audio twice
- Esme11:21I was thinking It kinda utilises visuals of the young boy and parts of their time together which sort of ‘revives ‘him from the dead, accentuaing the unqiue abilities of animated documentary. The radio interview audio also helps to validifiy it as factual subjective experience. The two styles also create different tones of subjectivity, but both highlight domesticity, which makes it more relatable to people I think.
- 11:22yes exactly
- Qi Sun (Susie)11:26I think the first time is more of what she feels and the second time is more of what she sees
- 11:27oh, yes
- Mesha11:29I do not like the fact that it played twice. The first one was enough. Or perhaps a mixture of the two would be better. The re-enactment is like the audience’s second playthrough of a film. It looses the emotional effect/impact a little on the second playthrough.
- Samuel Jewitt11:29for me the second run throufgh was more difficult to listen to as you know the outcome, you know shes going to find out her son has died talk about her others sons scream. it puts you in her shoes having to relive the event over and over again. i can imagine this film being played on repeat
- Mesha11:29I do not like the fact that it played twice. The first one was enough. Or perhaps a mixture of the two would be better. The re-enactment is like the audience’s second playthrough of a film. It looses the emotional effect/impact a little on the second playthrough.
- Dania Safdar11:30The two audios though words same, felt different. Her voice broke alot in the first clip. Like it was right after the incident. Second felt she had slight time to compose herself, and near the end her voice starts breaking again. Maybe it the same audio and the imagery changes your perspective or it is two audios.
Waltz with Bashir (Ari Folman, 2008)
learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/clip/220154
learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/clip/220155
- anyone see any links between Waltz with Bashir and His Mothers Voice?
- Dania Safdar11:49Yes its kind of similar to the two different styles they used in the two audio clips. One has flash backs and one is showing the convo in real time
- Esme11:49yes
- 11:50Ive seen the film and there is reptition of that memory in the water throughout, which shows how tramatic memory resurfaces similar to the first film
A Is For Autism (Tim Webb, 1992)
- its a great insite into the world of autism
- Dania Safdar12:12I liked how the audios were coming through, like the counting one
- Qi(Jenny)12:13Despite being about autism, the short film feels very light.
- Samuel Jewitt12:13my sister has downsyndrome and autism so alot of the behaviors are familiar
当一个人创作一个关于假设的心理或神经差异形式的动画纪录片时所经历的阶段(X)。1. 我对精神疾病/障碍/残疾(X)很感兴趣，想拍一部关于它的纪录片。(X)的背景有待商榷2. 一部动画纪录片是表现X的好方法，因为摄像机拍摄的与X生活在一起的人，不会显示他们的想法或感受有何不同。(理论上真人vs动画)3.我自己没有经历过X，所以……(能保持中立吗?)4. 我会找一些患有X的人来参与我的电影。(当X是什么感觉)。5. 为了让他们信任我我们必须互相了解。(移情问题)6. 我会录下对我的参与者的采访，我们会讨论和X生活在一起是什么感觉7. 根据他们的话，我将通过动画可视化(唤起)X8. 在开始制作之前，我必须询问我的参与者是否希望隐藏他们的身份(或)(ii)我的参与者很高兴能够被识别出来，但没有必要让动画看起来逼真;我本可以直接拍下来的。我将使用艺术的许可证来设计他们的角色
我看见你，你也看见我。我体验你，你体验我。我知道你的行为。你看到我的行为了。但我现在没有，过去没有，将来也不会看到你对我的印象。就像你不能“看到”我对你的体验一样。我对你的体验不在我的“内心”。它就是你，就像我所经历的那样。我并没有感觉到你在我体内。同样，我认为你并没有在你体内体验到我
Alex Widdowson
Escapology: The art of addiction
Critical Living
Music & Clowns
Patients
An Eyeful of Sound
- Film art Synesthesia -An Eyeful
- vimeo.com/11649675
- alexwiddowson.tumblr.com
I’m very interested in your lecture. You just had a slide about A interviewing what B saw. In my research, if A directly tells what A saw, it means that A himself is a patient, and he doesn’t need to interview B to understand the disease. Does this kind of research method have some not rigorous and subjective?